njui Iran exiles say Iraq forces kill 4 in camp raid

Nnwg CCTV cameras being used in school changing rooms and toilets
Qssx Trump suggests he will end birthright citizenship with executive order

Ikzj Missing Nottingham mother poses risk of harm to sons, court says
Xsih It was surreal watching it : how life changed for the woman behind Clap for Our Carers

Ugsq Like something from a Kubrick film 鈥?the hunt for Britain s best modern buildings
Czgh Four unhelpful myths about dementia: Our bleak view is often unjustified
An American court has granted a request by software giant Microsoft to continue selling its Word software, putting off an injunction that threatened to block sales of the company s flagship program.Last month a federal court granted Canadian company i4i an injunction against Microsoft over the way Word uses a computer language called XML - a method which i4i says is covered by one of its patents. Judge Leonard Davis, of the notoriously litigation-friendly Eastern District court in Texas, awarded the company almost $300m and ordered Microsoft to stop selling Word.However, after hearing motions from Microsoft, the US court of appeals has stayed the injunction, allowing the maker of Windows to continue selling one of its most popular products.The court also assented to Microsoft s request t <a href=https://www.stanleymugs.ca>stanley cup canada o expedite the appeal hearing, which will now be held later this month in an attempt to resolve the case quickly. We are happy with the result and look forward to presenting our arguments on the main issues on September 23, said a Microsoft spokesman.Doug Cawley of law firm McKool Smith, who is leading the termo stanley case on behalf of i4i, said that he was not overly concerned with the decision. A stay pending appeal is not unusual, and i4i remains confident that the jury and Judge Davis made the correct decision, he to stanley france ld the Guardian.The company had previously come in for criticism for choosing Texas as the venue for its action against Microsoft, which is incorporated in Washington

Lgdo David Tench obituary
Htth Care home coronavirus outbreaks cast doubt on official PHE data
Deploying troops on military operations without adequate equipment could breach their human rights, the high court ruled yesterday in a groundbreaking <a href=https://www.stanleycups.pl>stanley termos judgment which has widespread implications for defence chiefs and opens the door to potentially huge claims for compensation.Dismissing arguments by the Ministry of Defence, Judge Andrew Collins said that to send a soldier out on patrol or, indeed, into battle with defective equipment could constitute a breach of article 2 of the European convention on human rights, which enshrines the right to life.The lives of members of the armed forces when sent to fight or keep order abroad could not r stanley usa eceive absolute protection , the judge agreed. However, he added: The soldier does not lose all protection simply because he is in hostile territory carrying out dangerous operations. The protection of the human rights convention depended on the circumstances of a particular case. Yesterday s case was brought by the mot stanley uk her of Private Jason Smith, who died of hyperthermia in the heat of Basra in August 2003.Up to now, the courts have ruled only that human rights laws apply to British troops in their treatment of Iraqi detainees in British-controlled camps. Judge Collins yesterday went much further, saying that British troops themselves enjoy the human right to be protected by effective equipment, even on the battlefield.The ruling, which Des Browne, the defence secretary, said he would appeal, was welcomed by

Daxl Ministers sanctioned over benefit claims
Its a truth pretty universally unacknowledged 鈥?but for all that, blindingly obvious once youve been told by One Who Knows 鈥?that the world is ruled by a sinister cabal of deeply egotistic 鈥?and, by extension, viciously bigoted 鈥?individuals. Im not referring here to the usual suspects 鈥?I know there isnt a Jewish conspiracy, because Ive never been invited along to any of its meetings, any more than I have to those of the so-called establishment, and since my Wiki entry fingers me as both a Jew and an arch-establishmentarian, I know that at least these things must be true.Nor, indeed, is this a conspiracy of the believers against <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley cups the secular, the ugly contra the lovely, lizard-paedophiles averse to鈥?everyone, or the rich versus the poor. As to our fates being determined by some weird historic determinism, whereby humanity realises itself through successive class antagonisms... Nope, sorry Jezzer. Far from being wreathed in false consciousness, the cabal Im talking about hide in plain view 鈥?and perhaps the best way I have of getting you to eat the proverbial red pill, and so see for the first time the true horror that enfolds you, is for me to describe a group of these evil sv stanley cup engalis I saw only yesterday evening, outside a pub in Mortlake, south-west London.True, they arent an especially metropolitan phenomenon 鈥?but can be found an stanley vattenflaska ywhere human society tries to flourish. Nevertheless, there is a certain kind of affluent-but-slightly-quirky suburb, exemplified by Mortlake, a Njim Guardian Public Service Awards 2019: the judges
It was a decidedly anticlimactic end to a life-changing campaign. The document was sent by train to Washington in the middle of the night. A governme <a href=https://www.stanleycups.cz>stanley termoska nt employee met the train and rushed it to the secretary of state, Bainbridge Colby, who signed the Proclamation of Ratification at dawn, three days after Tennessee became the 36th state to vote for womens suffrage.Fighting the tyranny of niceness: why we need difficult womenRead moreThere were no photographe stanley mug rs to record the moment, no suffragists to bear witness. It was 26 August 1920 and after a grueling 80-year battle, the 19th amendment to the US constitution, granting women the vote, was ratified.In this centennial year, it seems a miracle the 19th amendment ever became law. The longest revolution began in earnest at Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848. It survived the civil war and the first world war and dozens of failed state votes. Suffragists were jailed, their protests mobbed, their arguments mocked in the press, on the floor of the House and Senate and in every state legislat stanley termohrnek ure. Decade after decade, suffrage remained a hopeless cause that consumed the lives of brave, persistent and often brilliant women.Ellen Carol DuBois has written a comprehensive history that deftly tackles intricate political complexities and conflicts and still somehow reads with nail-biting suspense.With the current feminist movement now in its fourth wave, how many American suffragettes are household names, besides perhaps Susan B Anthony and El

Dyan Police in England and Wales dropping rape inquiries when victims refuse to hand in phones
The online safety bill is returning to parliament under the aegis of its fourth prime minister and seventh secretary of state since it was first proposed as an online harms white paper under Theresa May.Each of those has been determined to leave their fingerprints on the legislation, which has swollen to encompass everything from age verification on pornography to criminalisation of posting falsehoods online, and Rishi Sunak and the digital and culture secretary, Michelle Donelan, are no differ <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley cup becher ent.Some of the changes to the bill, which was unceremoniously pulled from the agenda in early summer as the government cleared parliamentary time to launch its own confidence motion backing Boris Johnson, are simple additions. After the law commission recommended updating legislation covering nonconsensual intimate images, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport folded the c stanley cup price hanges into the bumper bill, announcing plans to criminalise downblousing stanley tumbler and the creation of pornographic deepfakes without the subjects consent.But others reflect the contentious nature of the legislation, which faces a balancing act between the governments desire to make the UK the safest place to be online , and its fear of appearing overly censorious or, worse still, woke .On Tuesday, Donelan triumphantly announced that the latest version of the online safety bill would be dropping efforts to regulate content deemed legal but harmful . Earlier drafts of the bill had hit upon a canny way to p Mvcb US lawyers explore extradition routes for Julian Assange
Campaigners attempting to stop the closure of their local libraries won a surprise victory in the high court on Wednesday when a judge ruled that the decision to axe services in Gloucestershire and Somerset was unlawful and should be quashed.In his judgment on a judicial review brought by campaigners in the two counties, Judge Martin McKenna found that local authorities had failed to comply with their public sector equality duties when pushing through t <a href=https://www.cups-stanley-cups.co.uk>stanley uk he closures.To the gasps and muted exclamations of the campaigners sitting at the back of the court, he ordered the councils to revisit their plans. Failure to do so, he said, would send the wrong message to other councils. It is important to the rule of law to give due regard to these issues stanley uk of equality, added McKenna, before refusing the defence permission to appeal. Gloucestershire and Somerset county councils could still lodge a request with the court of appeal.That prospect did not dampen campaigners joy. We re really pleased. Finally we have had proper scrutiny of the councils plan. But we shouldn t have had to go through this, said Johanna Anderson, founder of Friends o stanley mug f Gloucestershire Libraries.Speaking on behalf of the equivalent Somerset group, Peter Murphy said he and his fellow campaigners felt completely vindicated . The big society cannot be used to justify disenfranchising vulnerable individuals from the services on which they rely. Gloucestershire-based author Joan