Блогер Алистаров

LOS ANGELES, Jan 12 (Reuters) - Firefighters were slowly
<a href=https://kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo3ad.com>kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad onion making progress in their battle to contain the inferno that has razed swathes of Los Angeles' Pacific Palisades neighborhood to the ground, but still-spreading flames threatened communities in the populous San Fernando Valley on Sunday.
Aircraft dropped water and fire retardant on steep hills to stem the eastward spread of the Palisades Fire and KTLA television reported that ground crews had managed to save a number of houses, although others were lost.
kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad

kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad.com

Why expanding the College Football Playoff worked – and what still needs to be fixed
<a href=https://pilotekh.com/wiki/item/71484-roman-viktorovich-vasilenko-rossiyskiy-piramidschik>смотреть жесткое порно
Now that it’s all over and the Ohio State Buckeyes are the college football national champions, it can be definitively said: expanding the College Football Playoff worked.

The grand experiment to allow more teams to play for the national championship wasn’t perfect, but it ended up where it was supposed to: a worthy national champion with exciting, close games in the later rounds when the best teams faced one another. It gave us awesome scenes on campuses around the nation, created new legends and showed how a sport so steeped in tradition can evolve when faced with new demands from its fans and business partners.

Here are four reasons why the new version of the College Football Playoff worked – and the areas that can still be fixed.

The committee picked the right teams, even if some games were blowouts
Before the games kicked off in December, much of the focus was put on the inclusion of Southern Methodist University (SMU) and Indiana University – two teams that won a bunch of games but didn’t have the brand recognition of schools like Alabama, South Carolina and Ole Miss.

Here’s what else those teams had that SMU and Indiana didn’t: three losses.

The Hoosiers lost only once in the regular season – to eventual national champion Ohio State. The Mustangs had lost twice, once to Brigham Young University and again in the ACC championship game to Clemson.

In the first year of the expanded, 12-team playoff, could the committee really leave out a major conference team with 11 wins and punish another one for playing for a conference championship while other teams sat at home? Warde Manuel, the University of Michigan athletic director who served as chair of the committee, said they could not.

Why expanding the College Football Playoff worked – and what still needs to be fixed
<a href=https://ko.ru/articles/life-is-good-no-ne-dlya-vsekh/>порно секс жесток
Now that it’s all over and the Ohio State Buckeyes are the college football national champions, it can be definitively said: expanding the College Football Playoff worked.

The grand experiment to allow more teams to play for the national championship wasn’t perfect, but it ended up where it was supposed to: a worthy national champion with exciting, close games in the later rounds when the best teams faced one another. It gave us awesome scenes on campuses around the nation, created new legends and showed how a sport so steeped in tradition can evolve when faced with new demands from its fans and business partners.

Here are four reasons why the new version of the College Football Playoff worked – and the areas that can still be fixed.

The committee picked the right teams, even if some games were blowouts
Before the games kicked off in December, much of the focus was put on the inclusion of Southern Methodist University (SMU) and Indiana University – two teams that won a bunch of games but didn’t have the brand recognition of schools like Alabama, South Carolina and Ole Miss.

Here’s what else those teams had that SMU and Indiana didn’t: three losses.

The Hoosiers lost only once in the regular season – to eventual national champion Ohio State. The Mustangs had lost twice, once to Brigham Young University and again in the ACC championship game to Clemson.

In the first year of the expanded, 12-team playoff, could the committee really leave out a major conference team with 11 wins and punish another one for playing for a conference championship while other teams sat at home? Warde Manuel, the University of Michigan athletic director who served as chair of the committee, said they could not.

Галерея Девелоперов — это агентство недвижимости, которое поможет с подбором и покупкой новостройки в Москве и Московской Области абсолютно бесплатно, поскольку сотрудничает с застройщиками напрямую.
На сайте Developers.Gallery доступен каталог новостроек и статьи на тему покупки недвижимости в административных округах Москвы: ЦАО, САО, СВАО, ВАО, ЮВАО, ЮАО, ЮЗАО, СЗАО, ЗАО, НАО, ТАО, а также Московской Области: Зеленоград, Мытищи, Красногорск, Люберцы, Видное, Жуковский.
Приобретая новостройку на этапе котлована, имеется уникальная возможность извлечь из этого прибыль и рассмотреть покупку в качестве инвестиций. После ввода дома в эксплуатацию стоимость значительно прирастёт, что позволит перепродать её по переуступке, либо сдавать в аренду и извлекать из этого актива доходность.
Заказать звонок можно, перейдя по ссылке: <a href=https://developers.gallery/>Риелтор РњРѕСЃРєРІР° и менеджер составит индивидуальный каталог новостроек абсолютно бесплатно, поможет с записью в офис продаж застройщика, окажет юридическое сопровождение сделки: Проверит договор ДДУ, поможет с открытием счёта эскроу и аккредитива, а также направит инструкцию по выпуску электронной цифровой подписи для удалённой покупки в онлайн-формате.
Воспользовавшись услугами от Галереи Девелоперов вы экономите время и деньги, поскольку для вас согласуют персональные скидки и условия по покупки в рассрочку, базовую ипотеку, семейную ипотеку, IT-ипотеку и 100% оплату наличными, а ещё доступна покупка по программе trade-in — когда вы сдаёте свою текущую квартиру в обмен на новостройку.
Покупка недвижимости — это важный шаг, поэтому не менее важно подойти к ней максимально ответственно и положиться на опыт профессионалов, которые подберут жилой комплекс в непосредственной близости к станции метро, БКЛ, МЦК, МЦД, выездами на магистраль: СВХ, ЮВХ, МСД, Ленинградский Проспект, ТТК, МКАД и с большими лесными массивами, парками, детскими площадками, закрытыми от автомобилей дворами, сквозными подъездами, спортивными площадками, качественным озеленением с многолетними деревьями, солнечной стороной.

Why are teens losing their minds about college applications? This senior thinks she knows why
<a href=https://novostrojka-anapy.ru/pro-best-vej-i-finansovo-konsaltingovyj-holding-lajf-iz-gud>гей порно член

I spent my freshman year of high school despairing that I hadn’t invented a synthetic human heart, launched a tech start-up, written an opera or raised $10 million for charity.

I ran track, sang in a cathedral choir and taught little kids how to kayak in the school’s outdoor club. I was plenty busy. Where in the world had I gotten the idea that I was supposed to be doing those other things to get into college? Why did I think that I was running out of time — at age 14?
I’ve heard a lot about how social media creates unrealistic beauty standards, body images and lifestyle expectations among teenagers. But there’s another form of comparison egged on by social media: over-the-top extracurricular activities. The pressure I’ve felt to create a nonprofit and invent a solar-powered car that can drive underwater did not come from my parents or teachers despite what documentaries such as “Race to Nowhere” suggest. It came from college admission videos on social media.

I don’t mean videos on essay writing tips, standardized test study hacks or the self-taped, quasi interviews attached to some applications. I’m talking about a specific subset rampant on YouTube and Instagram Reels, videos dealing only in analyses of college acceptances and rejections. The format has been perfected to keep people viewing and clicking.
In these videos, students or, far more often, content creators outline a student’s background. They lay out their activities, grades and test scores, inevitably stellar and impressive. Then comes the hook: They outline every single school the student was rejected from, one by one, and the schools that accepted them. Often, the rejections are in big, red boxes, and the acceptances in green. The rejections are almost always shown first — lengthy lists naming Harvard, Duke and Georgetown universities and the like.

Why are teens losing their minds about college applications? This senior thinks she knows why
<a href=https://chelny-biz.ru/news/559293/>порно жесток бесплатно

I spent my freshman year of high school despairing that I hadn’t invented a synthetic human heart, launched a tech start-up, written an opera or raised $10 million for charity.

I ran track, sang in a cathedral choir and taught little kids how to kayak in the school’s outdoor club. I was plenty busy. Where in the world had I gotten the idea that I was supposed to be doing those other things to get into college? Why did I think that I was running out of time — at age 14?
I’ve heard a lot about how social media creates unrealistic beauty standards, body images and lifestyle expectations among teenagers. But there’s another form of comparison egged on by social media: over-the-top extracurricular activities. The pressure I’ve felt to create a nonprofit and invent a solar-powered car that can drive underwater did not come from my parents or teachers despite what documentaries such as “Race to Nowhere” suggest. It came from college admission videos on social media.

I don’t mean videos on essay writing tips, standardized test study hacks or the self-taped, quasi interviews attached to some applications. I’m talking about a specific subset rampant on YouTube and Instagram Reels, videos dealing only in analyses of college acceptances and rejections. The format has been perfected to keep people viewing and clicking.
In these videos, students or, far more often, content creators outline a student’s background. They lay out their activities, grades and test scores, inevitably stellar and impressive. Then comes the hook: They outline every single school the student was rejected from, one by one, and the schools that accepted them. Often, the rejections are in big, red boxes, and the acceptances in green. The rejections are almost always shown first — lengthy lists naming Harvard, Duke and Georgetown universities and the like.