vypr How my father may have helped Jimmy Savile escape justice

Qjdv Remembering those who have lost their lives in this pandemic
Ldjw I testified against Harvey Weinstein. No sentence can heal his victims, but it s a start
Its great that Matt Hancock and Sajid Javid have said they will regulate the internet, but what could they actually do <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.us>stanley cup The culture secretary said that when he called in representatives of 14 leading internet companies to discuss his ideas, only four turned up.The government said it will introduce new laws to tackle the full range of online harm . This must mean dealing not just with serious crime, but with the harm produced every day by social media, such as abuse, bullying, racism and misogyny, with little or no protection for children. These things either arent quite crimes, or arent serious enough for the police to chase 鈥?and there are precious few concrete ideas for how to reduce them.Social networks have few incentives to stamp them out 鈥?after all, a proliferation of controversial or aggressive comments helps drive their growth, regardless of the human impact.The UK has struggled to find a way stanley ca to regulate away the poisonous byproducts of social media. Theres much talk of treatin stanley website g platforms as publishers, but theres been little follow-through as to how this would work to prevent harm.Social media firms failing to protect young people, survey findsRead moreInstead, politicians fret over whether the baffling technology can be regulated at all; where regulation stops and censorship starts; and how effective rules could ever be for multinational companies anyway. Silicon valley tech bros even muse whether regulators are smart enough to keep up with them.This is, in part,